| The Need for a Plan | |
| Over
the past several decades, Lee County has experienced steady growth and
development.
Its central importance to adjacent counties as an employment base
and financial center, abundant water and sewer services, ample labor force,
and the desire of the community to foster and maintain a progressive business
climate, help to ensure growth in the future.
However, as growth and development occur, the pressure of development encroaching on the quality of life remains a possibility. Recognizing the need to update the aging Land Use Plan, both Lee County and City of Sanford appointed Steering Committees made up of a broad cross section of area residents. The Steering Committees were charged with guiding the preparation of the County and City of Sanford 2020 Land Use Development Plan, primarily for the physical development of the County and the City. The Comprehensive Development Plan is a policy-oriented document that allows flexibility in the physical development of the community yet at the same time employs sound planning principles to ensure a high standard of quality of life for area residents. |
|
| The Planning Process | |
| Throughout the planning process, an extensive public involvement program was attempted for the purpose of identifying issues and determining their relative degree of importance to residents of the planning area. Building upon this information, the Steering Committees reviewed, modified and endorsed a number of specific Policy Statements for consideration by the Lee County Commissioners and Sanford City Council. The policies that are presented in the document are the result of this process. As officially adopted policies of the County and City they will serve as a basis for future decisions on capital improvements, ordinances, zoning matters, subdivision approvals, and other related matters. Because the document refers to two jurisdictions in most cases, the term, “Community,” is used to denote both jurisdictions. | |
| Benefits of Long Range Planning back to top | |
| Planning
for the future development of Lee County, North Carolina and its municipalities
allows the Community to foresee
any expansions and changes affecting their growth.
It is the responsibility of the local governments and their elected
officials to regulate development using the applicable tool, such as the
Zoning Ordinance, the Subdivision Ordinance, or the Water Supply Watershed
Ordinance.
The primary function of the plan is to provide a long-range comprehensive planning tool that focuses on the politics guiding physical development. It lists goals and objectives representing a general direction that City and County leaders and citizens desire for the Community. The plan is designed to provide guidance during the review of rezoning requests, site plan proposals and subdivision proposals. The plan should be reviewed periodically as needed to update it as a policy document that predicts and responds to the changing conditions of the community. With a comprehensive land use plan, the Community can utilize knowledge of existing conditions – county land use, community services, population and housing trends – to project future needs. Improved development standards can be expected. Appropriate open space and recreation areas can be established with a land use plan. Future growth trends can reveal which areas are best suited for residential use, commercial use or industrial use. Future water, sewer and street locations are important mechanisms in land use planning. In general, where there is water, sewer and streets there is development. It is imperative that both the City and County consider these matters when making future land use decisions. With meager planning and inadequate development, the quality of life of the Community could deteriorate. Police protection, drug intervention, aesthetics, education, environmental issues and strategic neighborhood planning are all quality of life issues that will be discussed in the 2020 Land Use Plan. Regional planning issues outside of the planning jurisdiction of the City and the County that may have an impact on future growth and development should also be investigated. These issues include: the Randleman Dam; proposed designation of NC Highway 27/24 and US Highway 1 as interstate highways; the continued growth and development of the Fort Bragg military structure; growth of the Triangle as a whole; and the proposed Chatham-Wake nuclear waste site. Citizen participation enhances the content of this plan by creating goals established by the residents of the Community. Overall goals and objectives determined by the citizens will set the tone for future development. The comprehensive planning process has concentrated on “neighborhoods” of similar interest to address the goals and objectives of each neighborhood through strategic neighborhood plans. These strategic neighborhood plans will focus on the established goals, and will recommend action plans and implementation tools that will improve the quality of life within the neighborhoods. Area plans for each neighborhood will be discussed to help decide suitable development patterns. |
|
| CHAPTER ONE | |
|
The City of Sanford and Lee County make up a unique Community with a rich history, important natural resources, and a diverse economy. |
|
| Geographic Location | |
| Lee County is situated in the geographic center of North Carolina. It is on the divide of the Coastal Plains to the east and the Piedmont to the west. The City of Sanford (Lee County Seat) is approximately forty-five (45) miles south of Raleigh and Durham. Approximately one hundred fifty (150) miles to the east is the Atlantic Ocean, and one hundred sixty (160) miles to the west are the Appalachian Mountains. | |
| The County back to top | |
| Lee
County was fashioned from parts of Moore and Chatham Counties on February
16, 1907. It received its
name from General Robert E. Lee and was the 98th County to
be formed in North Carolina. The
County’s initial offices were located over Brown’s Auto Supply, which
was known later as Carter’s Furniture Company.
One year later (1908) the County’s initial court was held in the
old Opera House in the Page and Trust Company Building.
Although hunters and traders knew the area as early as the mid 17th century, permanent settlers did not locate to the area until the middle of the 18th century. According to historian Blackwell P. Robinson, the region was largely settled by Scotch settlers, many of them Highland Scots, fleeing oppression in their own country. Little growth occurred in Lee County until the discovery of coal deposits in adjacent Chatham County. In 1868, Col. Charles O. Sanford arrived in North Carolina to supervise the construction of a railroad line. The line was to run through Chatham County, crossing the existing Western Railroad line just northwest of the Jonesboro area. The small town that developed at the crossroads of these rail lines quickly expanded. Today, the county is known for its extensive railroad system and diverse manufacturing base. It should be recognized that the largest coal deposits in North Carolina were found in Lee County. During the early years of settlement, extracts from the once plentiful Pine trees supplied many states with tar, pitch and turpentine. Lee County is noted for its valuable shale (clay) deposits and is one of the Nation’s largest brick producing centers. There are several major highways that pass through the Sanford area. These highways include U.S. Highways 1, 15, 501 and 421. Business U.S. Highway 421 and Business U.S. highway 15/501 intersect near the downtown. N.C. State Highways 87, 78 and 42 also pass through the area. U.S. Highway 1 has been widened to a divided four-lane highway from Apex to Sanford and right of way acquisition has begun for the four-lane expansion of the highway south to Southern Pines. N.C. State Highway 87 from Sanford to Fayetteville is under construction to be widened to four lanes. Also, Horner Boulevard (U.S. Highway 421-Business) is currently being widened to a five-lane facility from Fields Drive south to Main Street. |
|
| The City back to top | |
| The
City of Sanford, established February 11, 1874, is named after Colonel
Charles O. Sanford, a civil engineer credited for building the railroad
from Raleigh to Sanford in 1872.
Sanford had an initial population of approximately two hundred
(200) persons. The original
town limits were established around the crossing of the railroads. The railroad system had an important impact on the Town of
Sanford.
At the time of the Jonesboro-Sanford merger on July 1, 1947, one citizen said, “Jonesboro is about 60 feet higher in elevation than Sanford, and is a suitable location for a city, but unfortunately no Raleigh and Augusta Railroad came to Jonesboro." Sanford Herald” interview with Mrs. LP Cox and written by Sandra Let. Major John W. Scott is responsible for the layout of the original town limits. He owned much of the land near the railroads where the Central Business District is today. The first school and church were built on land donated by Major Scott. Around 1896, W. J. Edwards and others derived the idea of pumping water to the town from Lick Creek. Sanford prospered as the water was pumped into the town and the sewerage was pumped out. Industry, banks and medical facilities began to appear as the town grew. As more and more people came to Sanford, the economy grew. Banks, industries, schools, churches, and a hospital were needed. The population steadily grew from 236 people in 1880 to 1,044 in 1900. The population of Sanford in 1940 reached 4,960. The Jonesboro merger increased the population of Sanford drastically, and opened Sanford to urbanized areas southeast of the original city limits. By 1950, Sanford had a population of 10,013. Today, the population is about 21,518. Much of the population increase has occurred because of annexations to the City of Sanford (Figure 4). |
|
| Climate | |
| The
Atlantic Ocean and the Appalachian Mountains influence climate in Lee
County. The Atlantic Ocean
and the Gulf of Mexico are the principal source of precipitation.
The mountains provide partial protection from masses of cold air,
which flow southward from Canada.
Average length of the frost-free growing season on the area is normally two hundred (200) days. The latest to expect temperatures of 32° F or less is early April. The earliest occurrence of frost in the fall is late October. The average annual temperature for Lee County is approximately 61°F. Seasonal temperatures range from July averages of 79°F to January temperature averages of 44°F. Annual precipitation averages about forty-seven (47) inches with the heaviest rainfall occurring from June to September. |
|
| Physiography and Geography back to top | |
| Lee
County is located in two (2) physiographic regions.
The northwestern two-thirds of the area is in the Piedmont and
the southeastern portion lies in the Coastal Plain.
This variation is reflected in the geology, soils, topography and
drainage of the two areas, and is partially responsible for the expansion
of industry in the Jonesboro area over the past few decades.
The Jonesboro region is flatter, thus making it a more suitable
site for industry.
The fall line that separates the two (2) physiographic regions generally follows Cortland Avenue northeast to Lee Avenue and then turns eastward. North of the fall line, the terrain varies from relatively flat areas, many of which are already developed, to very hilly areas with slopes exceeding twenty (20) percent. The roughest terrain is located east of Sanford near Oldham’s Lake. High density development in areas with slopes over twenty (20) percent should be discouraged because of potential erosion problems and the expense of providing public services and utilities. South of the fall line, slopes are not as steep and are much more favorable to intensive development. |
|
| Soils | |
| The
soils of Lee County play a major role in determining land use.
Some are better suited for agricultural uses, some for industrial
uses, and some for residential uses.
There are eight (8) different soil classifications in Lee County.
Please refer to the 1987 Lee County Soil Survey for each of the
classifications. General
characteristics, texture, crop rating, septic tank rating, urban use rating,
limitations, and hazards are given for each of the different classifications.
Approximately sixty (60) percent of Sanford is underlain with the Mayodan-Urban (MrB) soil classification. It has a slope of two (2%) to eight (8%) percent. Permeability, water capacity and shrink-swell potential is moderate for this soil. The main limitations for most uses are low strength and moderate shrink-swell potential. Also found is the urban land (Ur) classification, situated in the business districts and dominated by impervious surface. The Jonesboro area is comprised of the Dothan loamy sand (DoA) with a zero (0) to two (2) percent slope; the Dothan loamy sand (DoB) with a two (2) to eight (8) percent slope; and the Fuquay loamy sand (FuB) with a zero (0) to six (6) percent slope. These soils can be used for cropland. They are also suited for urban uses, and their permeability ranges from rapid to moderate. |
|
| Sensitive Environmental Resources back to top | |
| The
Triangle Land Conservancy conducted a preliminary inventory of significant
natural areas in Lee County in July 1996.
The study identified and ranked natural sites according to the
North Carolina Natural Heritage Program’s significance ratings.
The inventory found one site of national significance, three sites
of state significance, and 33 sites of County, local, or unknown significance.
Lee County’s streams run into the Deep River, the Cape Fear River, and the Little River. The County has three watersheds which have been identified as water supply watersheds by the State of North Carolina. The Cape Fear River Watershed and the Deep River Watershed are Class IV Watersheds and the Little River Watershed is a Class III Watershed. |
|
| Community Profile back to top | |
| Population | |
| City of Sanford 22,814 (estimate as of July 1, 1998) | |
| Town of Broadway 1,084 (estimate as of July 1, 1997) | |
| Lee County 49,456 (estimate as of July 1, 1998) | |
| North Carolina 7,431,161 (estimate as of July 1, 1997) | |
| Population Characteristics | |
| 75.6% White (1990 Census) | |
| 22.8% Black (1990 Census) | |
| 01.6% other racial group (1990 Census) | |
| 182.81 Person per square mile population density (1996 Lee County) | |
| 921.40 Person per square mile population density (1996 City of Sanford) | |
| 75,601 Population projected for the year 2020 | |
| Geography | |
| Sanford 23.9 square miles | |
| Planning Jurisdiction 9.5 square miles | |
| Broadway 1.3 square miles | |
| Lee County 259.3 square miles | |
| Taxes | |
| Sanford 1998-1999 Tax Rate $ 0.55 per $100 of assessed value | |
| Broadway 1998-1999 Tax Rate $ 0.59 per $100 of assessed value | |
| County 1998-1999 Tax Rate $ 0.71 per $100 of assessed value | |
| (Sanford and Broadway residents pay both City and County taxes for real estate and personal property) | |
| Development | |
| Value of Construction Authorized - 1998 | Residential Permits Issued – 1998 |
| Sanford $ 37,134,071 | Sanford 187 |
| Lee County $ 20,445,442 | Lee County 392 |
| Commercial Building Permit Value – 1998 | |
| Sanford $ 24,295,962 | |
| Lee County $ 2,942,350 | |
|
Housing |
|
| Total Number of Housing Units as of July 1998: 19,996 (All of Lee County) | |
| Single-Family Units 68% | |
| Apartment and Condominium Units 14% | |
| Other 18% | |
| Median Contract Rent (1997) $ 364 | |
| Median Home Sale Price (1997) $ 60,593 | |
| Economic Characteristics | |
| Gross Retail Sales 1997: | |
| Sanford $ 545,753,699 | |
| Lee County Include Sanford and Broadway $ 651,221,398 | |
| Average Household Size 2.60 | |
| Per Capita Personal Income $ 25,252 | |
| Median Family Income $ 40,100 | |
| % Population in Labor Force 54.9% (as of March 1999) | |
| Unemployment Rate 3.5% (as of August 1999) | |
| Bond Rating for City of Sanford | |
| Standard & Poor’s A1 | |
| Moody’s A+ | |
| Bond Rating for Lee County | |
| Standard & Poor’s A+ | |
| Moody’s A1 | |
| CHAPTER TWO | |
| General Approach and Population Assumptions back to top | |
| Sanford
and Lee County are going through To plan for the future, we need a common base of assumptions about the kind of future taking shape. We need to make assumptions about the number of people and where they are expected to live, about the number and type of households and the kind of housing they will need, about the number and mix of jobs and where they are most likely to locate. The Steering Committees examined the trends and made projections about population, households, and jobs. These trends tell us what can be expected by the year 2020 if current growth patterns continue. (These projections will be updated at least every two years to reflect any changes in growth patterns.) |
|
| Population Assumptions back to top | |
| Sanford
and Lee County are expected to grow in the years ahead but at a moderate
rate: about 2% percent each year. This growth rate means the total county population will increase
by a little over 967 persons each year as the Community moves from an estimated 48,369 persons in 1997 toward a
projected 75,601 persons in the year 2020.
In 1990, Lee County boasted a population of about 41,370 persons. Over the last decade, Lee County experienced population growth due to in migration at an annual rate of about 2 percent. During the same period, The City of Sanford grew somewhat faster, due to annexation, at an annual growth rate of about 21.7 percent. Population projections are educated assumptions, based on past trends and current information, about how much the community will grow in the future. Lee County is expected to maintain its moderate growth rate into the next century. The County population projected for year 2020 is about 75,601 people, reflecting a long-term annual growth rate of about 2 percent. The City of Sanford growth rate will likely be somewhat higher as annexation takes in more county residents. |
|
|
Lee County Population Projection for Year 2020
Sources:
US Department of Commerce, Census Bureau, NC Office of State
Planning And Planning Department Staff Projections using 2% annual growth rate |
|
| Racial composition is another element in the County’s demographics. In 1990, 75.6% of Lee County’s citizen were white, 22.8% were black and 1.6 % were of Hispanic and other race. For the last seven years, the racial composition in the County has maintained a constant proportionality between the white and black population. However, there has been a big jump in the Hispanic population. Since 1990, the Hispanic population has increased by at least 200%. The evaluation of the limited data available at Lee County schools, and the 18 top employers in Lee County, shows the Hispanic population grew from an estimated 900 persons in 1990 to an estimated 3,075 persons in 1996. The City of Sanford’s inner neighborhoods remain centers for the black population and the emerging Hispanic population, but approximately one quarter of the other neighborhoods in the County now have a significant racial mix. The Sandhills area of Lee County has the largest percentage of minority residents. | |
| A population with a substantial number of elderly and young residents. | |
| The age structure of Lee County’s population influences the area’s economic dynamics and service needs. The largest segment of Lee County’s population (60.6%) falls into the 18 – 64 year old working age brackets. Those in the 18 – 44 age group are now, and will continue to be, the largest segment of this population. However, Lee County’s elderly residents, age 65 and over, and youth, age 17 and under, together comprise 39.4% of the county’s population. These non-working age groups are a vital part of the community, but do require a variety of health, education, recreation and other human services. The elderly population in Lee County is rising while contributing a smaller share to current county and city revenues. | |
| Lee County can share the benefits of the region’s growth by continuing its active economic development efforts. | |
| As the employment center for the region, Lee County must continue to create jobs for its 18 to 44 year old working age groups, maintain efficient means of transportation to the county’s principal employment centers for the commuters in the work force, and stimulate growth of retail and other support services for these workers. | |
| Housing development will be important to the county’s overall health. | |
| There will be an increase in the need for housing catering to new households comprised of single adults, childless couples or smaller families. The development of new housing or the renovation of existing housing for these groups can be an important factor in attracting new residents to the county. Although stable population levels are forecast, this assumes a dynamic housing market. The more responsive the county’s real estate market can be, the larger the share of the region’s growth Lee County can attract. | |
| Changing neighborhood demographics will require adjustments in the locations and types of public services and facilities. | |
| While the overall capacity needs of schools and other public services and facilities are not expected to dramatically increase, demand for services for some groups such as the elderly and lower income residents will increase. In addition, changes in age and household composition will require timely and responsive adjustments in the provision of services. This must be a key strategy if quality services are to be provided for all population groups throughout the county. | |
| Population/Building Permit Relationship back to top | |
| A search of the Lee County and City of Sanford building inspections records shows steady growth in the number of housing and building permits. The basic result of this inquiry is set forth in two graphic tables (Figure 3 and Figure 4). | |
| Construction
Permits in Sanford City Limits
|
|
| Construction
Permits in Lee County
|
|
| Income back to top | |
| According
to demographic information supplied by Equifax Marketing and Decisions
Systems and the U.S. Bureau of Census, per capita incomes in Lee County
have risen steadily since 1990. The County’s 1997 estimated per capita income was higher than
that of the City of Sanford, Harnett County and the greater Research Triangle
Park region’s average (Figure 5).
Both the City and County’s per capita and median household incomes
were below the State’s. The County’s 1997 median household income was
$31,697. In comparison, the
median household income for both the City was $25,859, and $33,360 for
the State.
Sales and Marketing Magazine reported that 32% of Lee County’s 1996 households had an income of less than $20,000. This percentage is similar to surrounding Counties and States. Twenty-three percent had incomes over $50,000. Equifax National Decisions Systems reported that the County had a greater percentage of households under $25,000, particularly in the $5,000 - $15,000 ranges. Both the City and County had a similar percentage of households in the $75,000 - $100,000 ranges. |
|
| Per
Capita Income for Lee and Surrounding Counties
Includ The
following Counties in N.C.: Chatham, Durham, Franklin, Greenville, Harnett,
Johnston, Lee, Moore, Orange,
Person, Vance, Wake and Warren. Source: N.C. State Date Center, N.C. RTRP Data File 1994. |
|
| CHAPTER THREE | |
| Key Issue Areas back to top | |
| Through a survey conducted by the Planning staff it was determined that most residents of the Community agree that our community is a good place to live, and a good place to do business. We are proud of our image as a livable Community – a community set in the pleasant landscape of the Sandhills and Piedmont countryside, with thriving neighborhoods, stately trees, and a growing array of social, cultural, and educational amenities. We appreciate, as well, the fact that we are a prosperous community whose leaders are committed to the need for jobs, a strong tax base, and an economic climate attractive to business investment. Both assets ¾Livability and economic vitality ¾ must be preserved and strengthened as we plan for the future. The plan provides us with a vision for the future of the Community as well as detailed recommendations on how the vision can be achieved over the next 23 years | |
| Transportation | |
| People wait for what seems like “forever” for the light to change at a major intersection, on-street parking makes the street very narrow, roads need improvement, what can be done? How are the County and the City planning to address these and other transportation problems? | |
| City Gateways | |
| Sanford’s entrance corridors are not as attractive as they should be. What can be done to improve Sanford’s image? | |
| Economic Development | |
| Lee County has a wealth of cultural events, availability of open space, a stable tax base, and a good school system. What can the County do to promote tourism and economic development? | |
| Commercial Revitalization back to top | |
| Some businesses in Sanford’s older commercial centers and areas are not doing as well as we would like. What improvements can be made? How can we make downtown and other commercial areas attractive? | |
| Parks | |
| How many new parks are needed to meet Lee County’s population, which is projected to grow? What kind of facilities should these parks include? Bike trail? Walking trail? Swimming pool? | |
| Shopping Centers | |
| When a new shopping center is proposed – how will the planning commission and board of aldermen assess its impact and appropriateness in that location? What kind of access should there be? How much landscaping and how much off-street parking should be required? | |
| Downtown | |
| There are vacant buildings and second level vacancies in downtown. What can the City do to promote these sites and make them attractive to the private sector? | |
| Implementation Priorities | |
| Since there are many improvements necessary to enhance our Community, how will priorities be determined? | |
| Manufactured Homes back to top | |
| Since there is a lot of demand for Manufactured Homes, and a need to provide affordable housing, what we need to do to make sure that these developments are safe, meet all community codes and standards, and all follow uniform development guidelines? | |
| County Water Lines | |
| Is our community equipped with the necessary public infrastructure to meet the needs of current growth and meet the demands of potential growth in the next 20 years? | |
| Preservation of Farmland | |
| Do we need growth that strips our community from its farmland or growth that complements its farmland? Will the loss of farmland diminish our quality of life? | |
| Water, Air Quality and Natural Resources | |
| How can we make sure these natural resources are protected and enhanced for future generations? How can we protect water and air quality? Do we have adequate water and sewer service? How much open space and agriculture will remain in the environment? | |
| Planning and Development Key Issues back to top | |
| The
Community has experienced many
benefits from its growth. Our
local economy is very strong, and the range and number of lifestyle and
employment choices are widening.
Growth is occurring in almost all parts of the County, reflecting
an overall balanced growth pattern.
And more emphasis is being placed on the overall quality of life.
But the projections for the growth in the next twenty three years, and the realistic assessment of the mounting problems associated with urban sprawl and an expanding population, alert us to the fact that Sanford and Lee County are in store for tremendous change in the future, change that may not be positive. If we continue to develop and urbanize without changing our current course in many regards, our long term economic prosperity and quality of life will be in jeopardy. We only have to look at other major metropolitan areas ahead of us in their evolution to see how the choices these communities made or didn’t make influenced their ultimate urban form. |
|
| KEY ISSUES: | |
| A number of challenges face Lee County and the City of Sanford. Community safety and the cost of and the delivery of public services in light of diminishing resources top the priority list of community elected officials’ concerns. These issues must continue to be focused on intently. However, in terms of the future of the community’s physical development, Planning Staff suggests that four key issues stand out among all others as the most critical to address in the next five to ten years. | |
| Four Key Issue Areas, Identified by Planning Staff | |
|
1 - Economics Development 2 - Land Use and Transportation 3 - Urban Design 4 - Regionalism |
|